Development Talk

Sign the Petition!

 

June 9, 2011

Get on board and sign this crucial bill from the Avaaz group, disallowing the government to intervene and limit the right to public information, free speech, and open government.

50,000 votes are needed for this online petition, and we’re only 1/4 of the way there!

Sign the petition HERE.

From Avaaz:

“As citizens across South Africa, we call on you to protect our Constitutional commitments to accountability, freedom of information and the media in the “Protection of Information” Bill. We urge you to ensure that the bill only applies to core state bodies in the security sector, and that intelligence agencies are held to account by public scrutiny. Secrets with a bearing on national security must be determined by an independent panel appointed by Parliament and not the Minister of State Security. Penalties for unauthorised disclosure should apply only to those responsible for keeping secrets, and investigative journalists and legitimate whistleblowers should always be protected to release information in the public interest. Our democracy was hard-won, and we will not give it up lightly.”

Dispossessed, unrecognised and facing a ‘cultural genocide’, South Africa’s Khoikhoi and San community are petitioning the government for full recognition of their rights as indigenous people.

They claim that their history of oppression and dispossession has long been overlooked, with government preferring to focus on rectifying the evils of apartheid’s land policies.

Indeed, South Africa’s indigenous population have lived in the region of the Cape for thousands of years, but lost their and land and water to the first settlers who arrived in 1652. The current Land Restitution Act however, only considers claims for land that was dispossessed after the 1913 Native Land Act came into effect.

Zenzile Khoisan, a spokesman for the Khoi and Boesman National Assembly argues “In 1913 most of our land had already been usurped by various entities including the colonial authorities. Under the Land Restitution Act it is impossible for us to claim because we were the first in opposition of colonialism.”

Their grievances came to the fore in a march on Cape Town’s Parliament Buildings on Saturday 4th September, as reported by the U.K Guardian. They have issued a memorandum to President Jacob Zuma outlining their demands for recognition as the original inhabitants of South Africa. (more…)

The civil servants strike has brought learning and health care to a standstill. Photo: Kool_skatkat via Flickr

The civil servants strike has brought learning and health care to a standstill. Photo: Kool_skatkat via Flickr

South Africans are lucky to live in a country that has a Constitution which confers on its citizens many rights and freedoms. However, problems arise when you trample on someone else’s rights in the process of  practising your own.

Currently the members of the National Education Health and Allied Workers Union (NEHAWU), the Health and Other Service Personnel Trade Union of South Africa, the Public Servants Association, Democratic Nursing Organisation of SA and the South African Democratic Teacher’s Union (SADTU) are exercising their constitutional right to freedom of assembly, demonstration, picketing and petition.

These civil servants are on strike to demand a 8.6% increase with a R1 000 housing allowance. But in the process they are denying others their rights.

What about health and education?

According to the Constitution everyone has the right to basic education and further education. However, learning has come to a halt in schools across the country because teachers are striking.  Exams are just around the corner, but the Gauteng Education Department has decided to postpone the preliminary matric exams until the 3rd week of  September.

The Constitution also says that everyone has the right to health care. But health care practitioners are also striking and patients are being neglected. People who are sick, especially children, cannot fend for themselves. The Constitution says that everyone has the right to life and if the lives of these patients are put in danger because of the strike, their rights are being severely compromised.

Volunteers are helping out in schools and hospitals around the country, improving the plight of learners and patients slightly. But a speedy resolution will have to be found for this strike to avoid more rights being trampled on.

What do you think about the ongoing strike? How can it be resolved? Leave a comment below.

Judith February of IDASA said action is needed from civil society.

Judith February of IDASA said action is needed from civil society.

“The Protection of Information Bill is inherently unconstitutional.”

This is what Dr Laurie Nathan, research fellow at UCT’s Department of Environmental and Geographical Science, said at a discussion about the proposed Protection of Information Act and the Media Appeals Tribunal held at the Book Lounge in Cape Town last night.

Nathan, who is also affiliated with the Crisis States Research Centre at the London School of Economics, said that the principle of an open society is something which is found throughout our Constitution. The proposed Protection of Information Act will however, create a society of secrets.

Limiting rights

The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa says that anyone has the right to have access to any information held by the state, but the Protection of Information Bill aims to keep this information from citizens. According to Nathan, the Bill defines national interest and security so broadly that this definition can be used to keep any and all information secret.

The Constitution also states that everyone has the right to freedom of expression, including freedom of the press, artistic freedom and academic freedom. If the Protection to Information Bill is passed it will  cancel this freedom.

Nathan said that the issue of a Media Appeals Tribunal is something separate to the Protection of Information Bill. The fact that it has been lumped together with the Bill in debates has created confusion, which furthers the cause of those advocating for the Bill, he said. According to Nathan, the questions raised about ethics and the media make sense, but the proposed Media Appeals Tribunal is definitely not the vehicle to address this. Neither is the Protection of Information Bill.

What can you do?

The proposed Protection of Information Act is inherently unconstitutional. Photo: Zampano via Flickr

The proposed Protection of Information Act is inherently unconstitutional. Photo: Zampano via Flickr

“When listening to Laurie Nathan I ask myself: ‘How can we stop this?’,” the writer Dr Sindiwe Magona said at the event. “If we don’t act now, it will become law. The freedom we fought for and gained in 1994 will shrink.”

Judith February, Head of IDASA’s Political Information and Monitoring Service, agreed that action from civil society is necessary to address this issue. IDASA is putting together a media statement entitled Let the truth be told: Stop the secrecy bill! which has been signed by more than 100 organisations. You can sign the bill by clicking here or by SMSing your name to 32759.

“People are making a mistake if they think this Bill will only affect journalists. In reality any information that an ordinary citizen applies for will be hidden. It will affect ordinary poor people more than anyone else.”

IDASA has been talking to grassroots organisations, who have before made use of the right to access to information from government. These organisations understand what the proposed Protection of Information Act will mean. They have also signed the media statement.

Furthermore, IDASA is mobilising community radio stations to reach the greatest number of people in South Africa.

February encouraged people to write letters to the newspaper and to flood Cecil Burgess’ inbox. (Burgess is the chair of the parliamentary committee that’s looking at the Protection of Information Bill.)

You can also attend another discussion on the proposed Protection of Information Bill tonight, which will be hosted by the Mail&Guardian at the Nelson Mandela Gateway (V&A Waterfront) in Cape Town.

A refugee girl in one of the tents used to house people displaced by xenophobic attacks in South Africa in 2008. Photo: Development Works

A refugee girl in one of the tents used to house people displaced by xenophobic attacks in South Africa in 2008. Photo: Development Works

Beautiful! Exquisite! Professional! Captivating! This is what everyone sang after a well-presented musical play by Lawrence House, a refugee children’s home, which forms part of the Scalabrini Centre’s welfare programmes.

The show, commemorating Lawrence House’s 5th anniversary, was entitled “Mad Word” and was advertised by word of mouth. The “mad word” spread and it generated more than a hundred audience members.

While some disturbing incidences of xenophobia have flared up in South Africa after the 2010 FIFA World Cup, and a number of foreign nationals have left their homes in fear, this show displayed the theme of unity and love and emphasised the importance of “a happy family”.

Formed in 2005, Lawrence House is dedicated specifically to the care of abandoned and unaccompanied refugee minors. Its motto is the Bible verse “I was a stranger and you accepted me”. The House and its separate teenager cottage can accommodate up to 30 children. Boys and girls between the ages of 6 and 18 are taken in. Currently the House shelters children from Angola, DRC, Rwanda and Zimbabwe.

We at Creative Consulting & Development Works are firm believers in equal rights and observing the Constitution of South Africa, that is why we have also worked with the NGO for refugees, Adonis Musati Project.

If children from different walks of life can come together and use their talents to put on such a wonderful show, why can’t we as adults bury our differences and work together as well?