Development Talk

The Times published an article by Justice Malala on June 13, in which he discusses what he sees as the biggest social problems confronting South Africa in response to the issues outlined in the diagnostic overview of South Africa, a report released by Trevor Manual and the National Planning Commission. Malala’s main argument is that South Africa should not feel content with the progress that has been made in the last two decades, because it still faces big challenges.

One of the biggest challenges is the continued failure to improve the quality of education. Although the government spends about 6% of GDP on education, the public education system is floundering, literacy and numeracy test scores are low by both African and global standards and a wide gap in schooling quality for black and white learners persists. The South African health system is in distress as well; life expectancy is lower than it should be and infant mortality rates are still high. Finally, corruption and irregular over-payment are also massive strains on the system, totaling about R30 billion a year, an amount which could go a long way if it was spent on alleviating poverty.

The document is realistic and convincing. It touches upon many other challenges such as unemployment, inadequate infrastructure, poor public service, class and racial divisions, myopic view of politicians and weakening state and civil institutions. The good news is that these problems don’t fully negate the progress South Africa has already made and they are not insurmountable as long as they are managed. Now, more than ever, it is important that politicians and citizens work together to fix these social problems to ensure a better future for all South Africans.

To read complete document go to: http://www.npconline.co.za/MediaLib/Downloads/Home/Tabs/Diagnostic/Diagnostic%20Overview.pdf

Adrian Gore is one of South Africa’s top business men and has focused most of his time and effort providing health and sustainable livelihood opportunities for South Africans.

He funded Discovery Health, which is now SA’s largest medical support, which has provided healthcare for almost 2 million people. He is also the chairmen for Endeavor, a non-profit that provides entrepreneurial and business opportunities for emerging markets in economic development.

In short, he’s kind of a big deal and has made strides in supporting South Africa. I came across an Op-Ed of his from last fall that I thought was worth sharing.

In the Op-Ed he discusses the urgency for South Africa to become a leader amongst emerging markets and place its name on the map for economic and financial growth. He points to major countries such as China, Brazil, Russia, and India (CBRI) as examples of countries that have risen to become economic powerhouses, despite issues of corruption and poverty. Interestingly, he points out that what he believes to be South Africa’s biggest hindrance aren”t our fundamentals or resources, but rather our attitude…or skepticism.

He belives we are inhibitors of our own growth, allowing our insecurities and history to prevent us from believing that we are capable of growing and reaching a level of utmost success. While he does address issues in SA that one might consider to be majorly problematic, he also illustrates how the countries mentioned above face similar issues (and sometimes, worsely), but still manage to work past them.

Here are a few for thought:

•Brazil has similar levels of crime to South Africa, and shocking levels of corruption. Almost 30% of its Senate and House of Congress face criminal charges or are under investigation;

•Russia’s corruption levels are dramatically worse than ours and, owing to public health and demographic problems, the absolute size of its population is declining;

•India has serious infrastructural problems, and 45% of its massive population lives on less than $1.25 a day;

•China too has tremendous challenges. Between 45 and 50 million people a year move from rural areas to urban areas. Estimates show that China needs to build 35 000 skyscrapers and equip 175 major cities with mass transit systems by 2025 to deal with this exceptional mass of urbanisation

This isn’t meant to scare anyone, but it is the reality of the situation. So, though we’ve faced many struggles, we’ve already recently accomplished a great deal.

Here, Gore lists out some of our recent accomplishments:

To host a World Cup requires an inter-connected economy with sophistication in infrastructure, telecommunications, financial services, and more. Research after the World Cup showed that 70 – 90% of the people who visited South Africa rated us as “excellent” or “very good” across a range of measures, from accommodation to stadiums and even safety at the games. Our performance from an infrastructural perspective was even more remarkable. For the two seminal World Cups prior to ours, held in the USA in 1994 and Germany in 2006, almost no new infrastructure was required, whereas South Africa faced a staggering task. We needed to build six new stadiums, an entirely new airport (and do major upgrades on two others), the Gautrain, and other transport infrastructure. Yet we excelled, delivering more than we had committed to in the bid document. We built six stadiums simultaneously in around 30 months and at an average cost of $250 million dollars.

Compared to the Yankee Stadium, Wembley, the Allianz Arena and others, both the time scale and costs of South Africa’s projects were significantly lower. The same holds true for the building of King Shaka International Airport and the Gautrain versus similar projects internationally. Yet very few people give South Africa credit for its ability to roll out large infrastructural projects quickly and efficiently.

 ************

It’s interesting to read these two components (the good and bad) side-by-side. It’s a bit oxymoronic, but undoubtedly proves to us the successes we’ve already had, and how we can continue to use those lessons learned and examples to grow, and improve. As Gore mentioned, this effort isn’t led solely by govermnent, but by people and public services, too. With a bit of optimism and leadership, South Africa ‘can and must excel.’

Thoughts?

community can work together to fight crime,Photo:Nondumiso Ntsengentsu
community can work together to fight crime,Photo:Nondumiso Ntsengentsu

The Dewani saga (the “Tourist Honeymoon Murder” that has gained international media attention) has reinforced negative stereotypes about both Gugulethu and Khayelitsha townships.  As a response to the negative attention focussed on their community, the Gugulethu Youth Development Council (GYDC) has taken a stand against crime in their community by initiating an open dialouge for residents to voice their concerns and brainstorm about solutions.

The Council organised a press conference at the popular neighbourhood hangout, Mzoli’s Place, in Gugulethu on November 18th to address the harsh reality of crime facing South Africans.

The aim of the conference was to encourage the people of Gugulethu to participate in a public forum where they could discuss possible solutions to prevent incidents of crime, like the highly publicised Dewani incident,  that have tarnished the name of their community.

The chairperson of GYDC, Sonwabo Ngxumza, said that it is important for his organisation to encourage all residents to become involved in crime prevention.  Residents are requested to challenge local business owners to participate in existing community safety initiatives.

He also said that to make their township better, young and old people must get involved with structures that fight crime like the Gugulethu Youth Development Forum,the Gugulethu Police Forum as well as the GYDC.

The secretary of Khayelitsha Development Forum (KDF), Wandisile Ngeyi, added that stakeholders, businesses, government and civil society should all come on board to set up a statutory community structure that will fight against crime in these areas. He suggested that “a form of stipend [be paid] to those [residents] who will be patrolling at night [which] can be backed- up and supported by government and businesses” as one way to promote partnerships between businesses and residents.

 Ngxumza said he “is very delighted that they have reached a large number of people and the Annual General Meeting (AGM) is to be held next year”.

Judith February of IDASA said action is needed from civil society.

Judith February of IDASA said action is needed from civil society.

“The Protection of Information Bill is inherently unconstitutional.”

This is what Dr Laurie Nathan, research fellow at UCT’s Department of Environmental and Geographical Science, said at a discussion about the proposed Protection of Information Act and the Media Appeals Tribunal held at the Book Lounge in Cape Town last night.

Nathan, who is also affiliated with the Crisis States Research Centre at the London School of Economics, said that the principle of an open society is something which is found throughout our Constitution. The proposed Protection of Information Act will however, create a society of secrets.

Limiting rights

The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa says that anyone has the right to have access to any information held by the state, but the Protection of Information Bill aims to keep this information from citizens. According to Nathan, the Bill defines national interest and security so broadly that this definition can be used to keep any and all information secret.

The Constitution also states that everyone has the right to freedom of expression, including freedom of the press, artistic freedom and academic freedom. If the Protection to Information Bill is passed it will  cancel this freedom.

Nathan said that the issue of a Media Appeals Tribunal is something separate to the Protection of Information Bill. The fact that it has been lumped together with the Bill in debates has created confusion, which furthers the cause of those advocating for the Bill, he said. According to Nathan, the questions raised about ethics and the media make sense, but the proposed Media Appeals Tribunal is definitely not the vehicle to address this. Neither is the Protection of Information Bill.

What can you do?

The proposed Protection of Information Act is inherently unconstitutional. Photo: Zampano via Flickr

The proposed Protection of Information Act is inherently unconstitutional. Photo: Zampano via Flickr

“When listening to Laurie Nathan I ask myself: ‘How can we stop this?’,” the writer Dr Sindiwe Magona said at the event. “If we don’t act now, it will become law. The freedom we fought for and gained in 1994 will shrink.”

Judith February, Head of IDASA’s Political Information and Monitoring Service, agreed that action from civil society is necessary to address this issue. IDASA is putting together a media statement entitled Let the truth be told: Stop the secrecy bill! which has been signed by more than 100 organisations. You can sign the bill by clicking here or by SMSing your name to 32759.

“People are making a mistake if they think this Bill will only affect journalists. In reality any information that an ordinary citizen applies for will be hidden. It will affect ordinary poor people more than anyone else.”

IDASA has been talking to grassroots organisations, who have before made use of the right to access to information from government. These organisations understand what the proposed Protection of Information Act will mean. They have also signed the media statement.

Furthermore, IDASA is mobilising community radio stations to reach the greatest number of people in South Africa.

February encouraged people to write letters to the newspaper and to flood Cecil Burgess’ inbox. (Burgess is the chair of the parliamentary committee that’s looking at the Protection of Information Bill.)

You can also attend another discussion on the proposed Protection of Information Bill tonight, which will be hosted by the Mail&Guardian at the Nelson Mandela Gateway (V&A Waterfront) in Cape Town.

Two foreign nationals at the refugee camp during the xenophobic attacks in South Africa in 2008.

Two foreign nationals at the refugee camp during the xenophobic attacks in South Africa in 2008.

An awareness workshop on xenophobia held by the City of Cape Town at the Cape Town Civic Centre on 24 July 2010 is  proof that there are people in this city who are prepared to stand up for their brother and sisters from other countries.

The workshop aimed at reigniting the spirit of ubuntu in people’s minds. Many hands are better than one and if South Africans work together and make peace, the word “xenophobia” will remain only in our history books.

The City looked at factors that might contribute to these attacks. They felt that there is a need for community leaders to step out of their comfort zone and open the minds of communities.

The City found that communities might be lacking in political education about refugee rights. For this reason the workshop was held.

The organisers hoped to use this work to resolve issues that lead to these attacks. It set out the steps that needs to be taken to end the criminal violence.

The City feels that if Ward Development Forums, Ward and Street Committees, the Department of Social Development (both city and province) and church leaders could engage themselves in the communities they serve, they will be able to implement possible solutions.

THE WAY FORWARD

A refugee camp for victims of xenophobia in South Africa in 2008.

A refugee camp for victims of xenophobia in South Africa in 2008.

Ongoing, educational workshops can be conducted for local residents to be made aware of the Bill of Rights and refugees rights. Civil Society and Community leaders can also discuss these rights in their community and at sectoral meetings.

The power of advertising can be very useful to resolve these issues.  Posters, pamphlets, and word-of-mouth can lead people in the right direction.

As a social science research and communications consultancy working in the development sector, Creative Consulting & Development Works has seen the impact that communications can have on development issues and changing people’s perspectives.

Awareness programmes, targeting both high schools and primary schools would be very beneficial, as youth were also involved in these attacks.

WHO IS RESPONSIBLE?

A mother and baby in a refugee camp.

A mother and baby in a refugee camp.

Rallies are meant to mobilise communities, not only during the elections but also when issues like these crop up.  In this way the broader communities can be reached.

Community Based Organisations (CBO’S), Faith Based Organisations (FBO’S), and government departments can devise a mass awareness plan to reach out to those who are unaware of refugees rights. They have the power to facilitate and build cooperation between local and foreign nationals involved in businesses.

Humanitarian Agencies, Coordinating Committees and Government have to keep record of active organisations that deal with refugees. They have to support them to enhance their power to implement education and awareness programmes.

It is everyone’s responsibility to protect our rights and freedom. We can all live in love and peace with our brothers and sisters.

What is your opinion about the xenophobic incidences that are flaring up in South Africa again?

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »