Development Talk

When a State Turns Against its Citizens: Institutionalised Violence and Political Culture, a book by Lloyd Sachikonye, made its appearance on the shelves during a launch at Lobby Books, on Thursday 31 March 2011.

Clever Bere, the MC of the event, addressed the audience. He provided an educational background of the author and other discussants that were present at the launch. He said the timing of the book’s arrival was good, as Zimbabweans are still dealing with matters of runaway violence in their country.

Lloyd Sachikonye opened his statement by depicting Zimbabwe as a “country of contradictions.” He said it is a country with a high magnitude of well educated, skilled professionals, given the impression of its great potential. That was over the course of the past 20 years, and now, the country sees a bleaker future due to the harsh realities of political violence and ethical crisis.

“Roots of violence go a long way,” he said in his speech, highlighting beatings and violent acts against those who fought for freedom.

“People were shot in the townships. Stones, sticks and petrol bombs were thrown at those who were involved in the struggle,” he said.

Consequences of political violence includes fear and stress and now Zimbabwean society is under trauma. Horst Kleinschmidt of the Amani Trust took a stand, saying that this history takes us back to 1960. “History matters, we need to study our history if we are to deal with type of society we aspired to; not to fear those elements of the past year.”

There is hope among Zimbabweans to resolve struggle in non-violent way. Horst pointed to high rates of violence in 27 June 2008, where hospitals had to accommodate 200 people a day with cracked arms, legs and small bones. Though it was a deafening sight, people joined together as a community, offering basic services and encourage people to vote to protect democracy.

It was a powerful event as the author and several audience members shared stories of the injustice in Zimbabwe. As our neighbouring country, we must continue to look for ways to advocate on their behalf and put pressure on their government to support innocent civilians.

Photo by Jacana Media

 

Photo taken by Anatelle Ford for the Adonis Musati Project.

Photo taken by Anatelle Ford for the Adonis Musati Project.

More than a decade ago, Archbishop Desmond Tutu defined Ubuntu as an ethic which is upheld by someone  who has a proper self-assurance that comes from knowing that he or she belongs in a greater whole and is diminished when others are humiliated or diminished, when others are tortured or oppressed.’ In short, he described ubuntu as the essence of being human.

But what is the meaning of these words in the face of the mistreatment of refugees in South Africa? In front of the Department of Home Affairs, there are always refugees who have been sleeping on the pavement for days, trying to obtain an asylum seeker’s permit. They are not even allowed to use the building’s toilets and risk losing their place in line when seeking this service elsewhere.

 Recently it was said in the news that a lorry reportedly carrying sewerage had sprayed effluent onto hundreds of desperate immigrants young and old   at the Methodist Church refugee camp in Johannesburg.

 For decades, refugees have been a significant feature of the South African landscape.  South Africa has given official recognition to refugees, a move that has been highly appreciated.  However, refugees have experienced varying degrees of acceptance or rejection as they strive to make a living in a foreign land.  

Photo taken by Anatelle Ford for the Adonis Musati Project

Photo taken by Anatelle Ford for the Adonis Musati Project

 The scenarios presented above and other untold stories, makes one wonder whether the ethics of Ubuntu will remain a political philosophy. Ubuntu calls us to place equal value on all individuals, to raise the voice of those who otherwise cannot do it for themselves. It defines what it really means to be a human being.

The Adonis Musati Project, for one, believes in the spirit of Ubuntu. Named after a young Zimbabwean who died of starvation on the streets of Cape Town, this organisation aims to support refugees in their endeavours to make a life for themselves.

 The Development Works team hopes to support them as much as possible.

Four way choice in Zimbabwe

 

February 11, 2008


With just under 8 weeks to go before the elections, last week saw the announcement of the failure of the 2 MDC factions to form a coalition for the upcoming election in March. Talks between the two party leaders, Morgan Tsvangirai and Arthur Mutambara, collapsed after their failure to agree on the selection of candidates in the election. The other dramatic turn in the week was the announcement by Simba Makoni, a former Finance Minister and member of the ZANU PF politburo, that he would be contesting the elections as an Independent. Makoni has for a long time been viewed as a possible successor of Mugabe who would be acceptable to the people of Zimbabwe, as well as the international community. If the reports that Makoni is being supported by senior members of ZANU PF are true, then his coming in can be viewed as providing an alternative leadership for the disgruntled members of the ruling party who are no longer satisfied with the current incumbent, Mugabe. This will be the first time that President Mugabe has actually had someone from the ruling party opposing him. This could also be viewed as a tangible sign of a rift with the ruling party which for the past 28 years projected an image of being united and is a huge blow.

The MDC has welcomed Simba Makoni’s entry into the presidential race. His entry could result in one of the two MDC candidates deciding to unite with Simba Makoni in the coming elections. The negative impact of his entry is that it could divide the MDC support base in the urban areas. There are some circles in Zimbabwe who are viewing his entry as another ZANU PF gimmick thrown in to disorient the voters.

The people of Zimbabwe have over the last 7 years yearned for change in Zimbabwe. However the absence of an electoral environment that is conducive for a free and fair election has hampered these efforts. The weakened opposition had eroded any prospects of reforms in Zimbabwe. However the coming in for Simba will divide the ruling party and provide an opportunity for reformists within and outside ZANU PF to emerge. The election will not necessarily bring about meaningful change but could merely usher in a shift in the balance of power within the ruling party.

But more importantly what do all these happenings mean for the common man on the street who is going without basic food, water, electricity and power? Do they have any hope in an election, to they believe in democracy? Will they even go to vote this year? Do they have the desire, the energy or even the power to do so? Are the people of Zimbabwe still looking for a change of governance? Or do they just want an end to their hunger and lack of basic amenities?


Filed under: election,Makoni,Mugabe,Tsvangirai,Zimbabwe — @ 2:23 pm