Development Talk

Minister Naledi Pandor says more should be spent on research. Photo: World Economic Forum via Flickr

Minister Naledi Pandor says more should be spent on research. Photo: World Economic Forum via Flickr

Not enough money is being spent on research and development in South Africa.

This is what Minister of Science and Technology Naledi Pandor said when she presented the department’s National Survey of Research and Experimental Development report for 2008/2009 yesterday.

BuaNews reports that even though R2.4 billion more was spent on research and development than last year, the government’s target of spending 1% of GDP on this field has not been met.

This year R21 billion has been spent on research and development. According to Pandor, President Jacob Zuma wants spending on this field to increase to 1.5% of GDP by 2014.

(more…)

Patricia de Lille was appointed as Minister of Social Development in the Western Cape. Photo: Carolyn Meads via Flickr

Patricia de Lille was appointed as Minister of Social Development in the Western Cape. Photo: Carolyn Meads via Flickr

Premier Helen Zille has reshuffled her cabinet in the Western Cape and Patricia de Lille has been appointed as the new Minister of Social Development.  It will now be interesting to see what the impact will be on the social development sector in the province.

Polity.org reports that De Lille said: “Social development is my passion. For 24 years I’ve been fighting for the poor and the downtrodden. You won’t find me in an office, I will be out there dealing with the problems on the ground.”

This follows after the ID, the political party formed by De Lille in 2003, joined the DA on 15 August this year. According to Who’s Who of Southern Africa De Lille was the first woman to form a political party in this country.

South African History Online says De Lille has been vocal on “sensitive issues such as corruption, HIV/AIDS, women and child abuse, children in prison, xenophobia and poverty”.  She also serves on the boards of the following organisations:

The new appointment might mean new energy in the sector. Whatever happens, the most important thing is the impact on the poorest communities. Will a new appointment make a difference to them?

Jacob Zuma seems to be losing favour. Photo: Globovision via Flickr

Jacob Zuma seems to be losing favour. Photo: Globovision via Flickr

It was not so long ago that ANC Youth League president Julius Malema said he would “Kill for Zuma”, but now it seems that President Jacob Zuma has fallen out of favour with the ANCYL and leaders within his own party. Could we soon see a new candidate stepping up to become president of the ANC? Or will there be a split in the ruling party – reminiscent of the COPE formation?

The Mail&Guardian wrote today that tensions are brewing within the party and the tripartite alliance, which will probably reach boiling point at the ANC National General Council (NGC)that kicks off on 20 September. News24 earlier reported that Zuma will not be attending the United Nations general assembly on the 23rd of September, as he is prioritising the ANC NGC. The presidential spokesperson denied that this was because of rumours relating to a planned revolt in the ANC.

Now the M&G is saying “many party leaders have their eye on higher office or want to punish Zuma for not rewarding them sufficiently for their support in the run-up to the ANC’s 2007 Polokwane conference”. They name Siphiwe Nyanda, the communications minister, Fikile Mbalula, the deputy police minister, and Malema.

Who will next feature on election posters for the ANC? Photo: Attawayjl via Flickr

Who will next feature on election posters for the ANC? Photo: Attawayjl via Flickr

The newspaper also reports that a group of ANC members including Deputy President Kgalema Motlanthe, Human Settlements Minister Tokyo Sexwale and Lindiwe Sisulu are said to be banding together with Zwelinzima Vavi, Cosatu‘s general secretary, and ANCYL members (including Malema) to make sure that Zuma does not serve another term as president.

Apparently these people are: “Discussing a return to such values as a rejection of corruption and a clear division between party and state”. This sounds much the same to what the members of COPE were saying when they split off from the ANC.

It has repeatedly been said by analysts that it would be good for the country’s democracy if the ANC had a strong party to oppose it. The possibility of perhaps losing an election would keep the ruling party on its toes and ensure better service delivery to the people of this country. COPE has failed to provide this opposition, not gathering enough votes in the national election and being plagued by infighting.

Is there perhaps hope in a new party? Will people have faith in a faction that includes Malema, seeing as this controversial figure’s popularity is plummeting?

Judith February of IDASA said action is needed from civil society.

Judith February of IDASA said action is needed from civil society.

“The Protection of Information Bill is inherently unconstitutional.”

This is what Dr Laurie Nathan, research fellow at UCT’s Department of Environmental and Geographical Science, said at a discussion about the proposed Protection of Information Act and the Media Appeals Tribunal held at the Book Lounge in Cape Town last night.

Nathan, who is also affiliated with the Crisis States Research Centre at the London School of Economics, said that the principle of an open society is something which is found throughout our Constitution. The proposed Protection of Information Act will however, create a society of secrets.

Limiting rights

The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa says that anyone has the right to have access to any information held by the state, but the Protection of Information Bill aims to keep this information from citizens. According to Nathan, the Bill defines national interest and security so broadly that this definition can be used to keep any and all information secret.

The Constitution also states that everyone has the right to freedom of expression, including freedom of the press, artistic freedom and academic freedom. If the Protection to Information Bill is passed it will  cancel this freedom.

Nathan said that the issue of a Media Appeals Tribunal is something separate to the Protection of Information Bill. The fact that it has been lumped together with the Bill in debates has created confusion, which furthers the cause of those advocating for the Bill, he said. According to Nathan, the questions raised about ethics and the media make sense, but the proposed Media Appeals Tribunal is definitely not the vehicle to address this. Neither is the Protection of Information Bill.

What can you do?

The proposed Protection of Information Act is inherently unconstitutional. Photo: Zampano via Flickr

The proposed Protection of Information Act is inherently unconstitutional. Photo: Zampano via Flickr

“When listening to Laurie Nathan I ask myself: ‘How can we stop this?’,” the writer Dr Sindiwe Magona said at the event. “If we don’t act now, it will become law. The freedom we fought for and gained in 1994 will shrink.”

Judith February, Head of IDASA’s Political Information and Monitoring Service, agreed that action from civil society is necessary to address this issue. IDASA is putting together a media statement entitled Let the truth be told: Stop the secrecy bill! which has been signed by more than 100 organisations. You can sign the bill by clicking here or by SMSing your name to 32759.

“People are making a mistake if they think this Bill will only affect journalists. In reality any information that an ordinary citizen applies for will be hidden. It will affect ordinary poor people more than anyone else.”

IDASA has been talking to grassroots organisations, who have before made use of the right to access to information from government. These organisations understand what the proposed Protection of Information Act will mean. They have also signed the media statement.

Furthermore, IDASA is mobilising community radio stations to reach the greatest number of people in South Africa.

February encouraged people to write letters to the newspaper and to flood Cecil Burgess’ inbox. (Burgess is the chair of the parliamentary committee that’s looking at the Protection of Information Bill.)

You can also attend another discussion on the proposed Protection of Information Bill tonight, which will be hosted by the Mail&Guardian at the Nelson Mandela Gateway (V&A Waterfront) in Cape Town.

Women often still perform gendered roles in the workplace. Photo by Chris Kirschhoff.

Women often still perform gendered roles in the workplace. Photo by Chris Kirschhoff.

Women’s resistance to traditional gendered roles performed within the family structure, has led to new roles of performance in relation to work, marriage and childcare.

Throughout history certain norms were created determining gender roles. Women were perceived as the primary caregiver and men dominated in the workplace. Within the home these norms were learnt and thus maintained. In past decades this has apparently started to change with more women entering the working world.

 This shift in women performing work outside the home is associated with the female claim to autonomy. But how free are women really, even in their new roles? This autonomy claimed in many instances is contradictory.

 Women perform work within a gendered environment which reproduces the inequalities apparent within the family’ and other social institutions. For example, look at the glass ceiling effect the fact that women rarely reach prominent positions in a company due to discrimination. Also, very few women have yet been employed in male dominated areas such as the construction industry.

Photo by Chris Kirschhoff.

Photo by Chris Kirschhoff.

 There is apparently a lot of attention paid to the unequal position of women in the workplace, but the policies and structures implemented by government to address inequality in reality furthers the persistence of gender inequality. According to the Basic Conditions of Employment Act, women are entitled to at least 4 months of Consecutive  Maternity Leave, while men get 3 days Family Responsibility Leave. Does this not imply that the woman should stay at home and start raising the children while the man can go back to work almost immediately?  

 Top-down policy measures will not work as the historical construction of appropriate gendered behaviour is deeply rooted within the social fabric of society. It is only from below that this issue can truly be addressed.

Older Posts »